Legislature(1995 - 1996)
03/20/1996 08:20 AM House RES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
HB 388 - OIL & GAS LEASING; BEST INT. FINDINGS The first order of business was CSHB 388(O&G), "An Act revising laws relating to oil and gas leasing as related to land previously the subject of a written best interest finding; amending provisions setting out exceptions to sales, leases, or other disposals for which a revised written best interest finding is not required; authorizing annual offer of land for oil and gas leases if the land, or adjacent land, was the subject of a best interest finding and if preparation of a supplement to the best interest finding for that land is not justified; and modifying the statement of purpose in the Alaska Land Act as it applies to oil and gas leasing." Number 042 REPRESENTATIVE NORMAN ROKEBERG, sponsor of the measure, related that he had reviewed the proposed amendments and is in full accordance with the changes and duly noted a drafting change on page 6. He urged committee's approval of the legislation disclosing that it is caucus priority. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN recessed the committee due to lack of quorum. REPRESENTATIVE ALAN AUSTERMAN asked for explanation of the drafting change on page 6. Number 141 CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN explained the change was a drafting preference by the drafter which rearranged committee recommendations. Number 212 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG approved of the drafting change because he felt that it made the language clearer. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN announced that the committee had a quorum and entertained motion to adopt the committee substitute. CO-CHAIRMAN BILL WILLIAMS moved for the adoption of the proposed committee substitute for HB 388(RES), Version "M." CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN asked if there was an objection. Hearing none, CSHB 388(RES), Version "M" was adopted. Number 281 REPRESENTATIVE JOHN DAVIES offered the following amendment to page 6, line 27: Following: "may" Insert: ", for state land north of the Umiat baseline." REPRESENTATIVE DAVIES explained that the amendment would make the bill applicable to the North Slope. The reason being he believes the situation on the North Slope where the homogeneous distributions of land there are suitable to the areawide proposals in HB 388, and the heterogeneous nature of the Cook Inlet Basin which are not so suitable to the bill, thus the reason for offering the amendment. Number 350 REPRESENTATIVE ROKEBERG indicated objection to the adoption of the amendment, saying that the amendment does a very specific thing. The bill before the committee, Version M, is non-specific to area, it is also discretionary in a large degree. The Oil and Gas and Resources Committees spent a substantial time, during the interim, having major discussions and hearings. This is a topic that was discussed in the Governor's Oil and Gas Policy Council and there was concern expressed by the Administration about the Cook Inlet area. That is why major accommodations were made and revisions in the original bill to remove specific geographic areas from the statutory changes to give the commissioner the ability to incrementally implement this process as he sees fit. As the we have heard from the director of the Division of Oil and Gas, he is in support of this. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN addressed Ken Boyd for his position on the amendment. Number 490 KENNETH A. BOYD, Director, Division of Oil and Gas, Department of Natural Resources, testified via teleconference from Anchorage. He stated he understands the amendment. He said, "Once you build a foundation finding, I think that's the key. As long as you have a complete finding, the annual offer of sales, no matter where they are, is somewhat perfunctory. The sale isn't the issue, it is the finding and once you can do the finding, you can have the sale. So, I don't think you absolutely need sale area specificity, but I do know that the first sale that will take place under this new system, if you like - it isn't really new - it's new and (indisc.), will take place on the North Slope and it will take place between the Colville and the (indisc.) as it is currently under schedule, as the letter I wrote to the committee on the sixteenth of January." Number 568 MR. BOYD felt that it would be harder in Cook Inlet because the title is less clear, there are more people living there and the land ownership is somewhat uncertain. MR. BOYD said he believes that the process, as described in the new legislation, is universally applicable. He said, "Only time will tell, as to whether we can create a finding that will satisfy all the people that will be subjected to that finding, but once you do that - once you have that foundation finding and give people the opportunity to comment on a yearly basis, and create a supplement to the finding based on that new information, I do not believe that you would need area specificity." Number 621 CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN said that he would object to Representative Davies amendment. He then asked for a roll call vote. Representatives Davies and Nicholia voted in favor of the amendment. Representatives Austerman, Ogan, Williams and Green voted against the amendment. So, the amendment failed. Number 671 PAT FOLEY, Chairman, Lands Exploration and Operations Committee, Alaska Oil and Gas Association, testified via teleconference from Anchorage. He stated that he had nothing to add to the testimony except his support for committee substitute, Version M. Number 699 BRADLEY PENN, Marathon Oil Company, was next to testify via teleconference from Anchorage. He testified that the committee substitute, Version M, streamlines the existing process and helps the Division of Oil and Gas prepare best interest findings on an areawide basis. Marathon Oil Company supports CSHB 388(RES), Version (M). CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN asked if there was anyone else wishing to testify. There being none, he closed the public hearing on HB 388. Number 783 REPRESENTATIVE AUSTERMAN made a motion to pass CSHB 388(RES), Version M, out of committee with individual recommendations and a zero fiscal note. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN called for a brief at ease. Number 829 CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN acknowledged the motion to move CSHB 388(RES), Version M. Number 840 REPRESENTATIVE AUSTERMAN then withdrew his motion. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN announced the committee will probably be recessed until later in the day at which time a vote will be taken. HB 388 - OIL & GAS LEASING/ BEST INT. FINDINGS Number 454 REPRESENTATIVE RAMONA BARNES moved and asked unanimous consent to move CSHB 388(RES) from committee with individual recommendations. Number 474 REPRESENTATIVE DAVIES objected. CO-CHAIRMAN GREEN asked for a roll call vote. Representatives Austerman, Barnes, Kott, Long, Nicholia, Williams and Green voted in favor of moving the bill. Representative Davies voted against moving the bill. So, CSHB 388(RES) moved out of the House Resources Committee.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|